Darts & Flowers

From the highly acclaimed (I wonder why...) Broadway musical, the long awaited theatrical version of the revisited and mixed Disney tales, all together in a bombastic adaptation, is nothing more than a quite boring patchwork of scenes. Missable. Mark: 6 / 10

Technically and actingly superb, this enjoyable divertissement unfortunately gives an overall slight impression of stretched-to-excess funny experiment. Mark: 7.75 / 10

Frankly I mildly disagree with all the people saying this is better than the first chapter, but it remains a great animated work of art and deserves all the praises it got. Highly recommended. Mark: 8 / 10

More than an elegant portrait of Lady Di's last years, this product resembles a cheap adaptation from a mediocre Harmony novel. Naomi, what have you done? Mark: 5 / 10

From a 1985 theatrical play, a moving and somewhat interesting HBO movie. Not entirely developed, in my opinion. And the co-producer Ruffalo should have renounced to the main role. Mark: 6.5 / 10

It's so excessive and disturbing that it ends to be dull and completely, madly, frantically useless. One of the worst movies I've ever seen. Indeed. And don't tell me I haven't properly understood it: it's rubbish. Mark: 2 / 10

Despite my skepticism, the overall weak reception by the majority of specialized journalists, and the risks of a complete reinterpretation of the so well-known fairytale, this movie is a gem. The mad king and the inept fairies are unmissable, as well as the unique Angelina. Mark: 8 / 10